![]() "Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test." Phys Ther 80(9): 896-903. ![]() Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 55(2): M70-73. "Feasibility and measurement properties of the functional reach and the timed up and go tests in the Canadian study of health and aging." Journals of Gerontology. "Rethinking the neurological examination II: dynamic balance assessment." Arq Neuropsiquiatr 69(6): 959-963. "Attention, frailty, and falls: the effect of a manual task on basic mobility." J Am Geriatr Soc 46(6): 758-761. "Dual task interference in estimating the risk of falls and measuring change: a comparative, psychometric study of four measurements." Clin Rehabil 24(9): 831-842. "The effect of cognitive demand on timed up and go performance in older adults with and without Parkinson disease." Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 27(1): 2-7. "Cognitive processing and body balance in elderly subjects with vestibular dysfunction." Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 78(2): 87-95.Ĭampbell, C. It should become part of the routine neurological examination.ĭo you see an error or have a suggestion for this instrument summary? Please e-mail us!Ĭaixeta, G. In the elderly, it greatly enhances measurement of the risk of falling. TUG-Cog is simple to administer and interpret at the bedside.In PD, changes in gait under dual task conditions are proportional to the complexity of the secondary task performed.However, Rockwood et al reports poor test-retest reliability of the TUG in individuals with cognitive impairments. The effect on the reliability of the TUG (Cognitive) has not been studied in individuals with cognitive impairments.Therefore, the addition of a dual-task did not increase the sensitivity of the TUG in predicting the likelihood for falls in that study. Shumway-Cook et al, 2000 found that the TUG, TUG (Manual) and TUG (Cognitive) were all comparable in determining the likelihood of falls in older adults.Language and educational levels should be considered when applying this test. Individuals are asked to perform subtraction.Is additional research warranted for this tool (Y/N) Students should be exposed to tool? (Y/N)Īppropriate for use in intervention research studies? (Y/N) Students should learn to administer this tool? (Y/N) Recommendations for entry-level physical therapy education and use in research: Recommendations based on EDSS Classification: Recommendations for use based on ambulatory status after brain injury: Recommendations based on level of care in which the assessment is taken: Recommendations Based on Parkinson Disease Hoehn and Yahr stage: Reasonable to use, but limited study in target group / Unable to Recommend These recommendations were developed by a panel of research and clinical experts using a modified Delphi process.įor detailed information about how recommendations were made, please visit: Recommendations for use of the instrument from the Neurology Section of the American Physical Therapy Association’s Multiple Sclerosis Taskforce (MSEDGE), Parkinson’s Taskforce (PD EDGE), Spinal Cord Injury Taskforce (PD EDGE), Stroke Taskforce (StrokEDGE), Traumatic Brain Injury Taskforce (TBI EDGE), and Vestibular Taskforce (VEDGE) are listed below. Lundin-Olsson et al (1998): TUG Manual: same as TUG, but individuals stand up, grasp a tumbler containing water placed on a table just beside the chair, carry the tumbler while walking, put it on the table and sit down. TUG Manual: Same as TUG, but individual carries a full glass of water in one hand. Maranhao-Filho et al (2011): TUG-Cog: Alternatively may recite alternating letters of the alphabet (a-c-e) aloud. Individuals are able to follow simple instructions. Individuals are permitted to use the assistive device they typically use in the community, but without the assistance of another person. The test includes the time the individual takes to get out of the chair after he/she is told to "go". In the TUG (Manual) it has been suggested that the client must walk holding a cup filled with water (Shumway-Cook et al ,2000, Hofheinz and Schusterschitz, 2010) In the TUG (Cognitive), individuals were asked to complete the test while counting backward by threes from a randomly selected number between 20 and 100. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |